Info

General info:

  • Two methods were employed to undertake a differential expression analysis, namely limma/voom and deseq2.
  • Some values have been rounded

Datasets analysed:

  • mirna smrnaseq: TRUE
  • mirna excerpt: TRUE
  • pirna excerpt: FALSE
  • trna excerpt: TRUE
  • circrna excerpt: FALSE
  • gencode excerpt: TRUE

Treatment comparisons:

  • treatment1 - treatment2
  • treatment1 - treatment3

Total number of samples: 12

Number of samples in each treatment group:

  • treatment1: 4
  • treatment2: 4
  • treatment3: 4

All differential expression results

RNA’s with a p-value smaller than 0.1 and a log fold change greater/smaller than +-log2(1.1) for both the limma/voom and the deseq2 differential expression method are reported here.

  • ‘significant_1%’ means the RNA meets the logFC threshold and has an adjusted p-value smaller than 0.01

  • ‘significant_5%’ means the RNA meets the logFC threshold and has an adjusted p-value smaller than 0.05

  • ‘significant_10%’ means the RNA meets the logFC threshold and has an adjusted p-value smaller than 0.10

  • ‘greater_than_10%’ means the RNA meets the logFC threshold and has an adjusted p-value smaller than 0.10

 

Generated by ESR Genomics

www.esr.cri.nz